Skip to main content

The Dip

This isn't exactly a book report, but my thoughts have been spurred by reading Seth Godin's The Dip. One thing that I remember hearing over and over again in library school was that libraries (especially public libraries) need to stop being everything to everyone if they want to continue succeeding. At the time I thought that was a pretty easy piece of advice to remember. Then I started working in a public library where we were horribly understaffed and underfunded, just like many others. While I was still trying to figure out my exact role in the organization I picked up projects haphazardly, partly so I could fill my day and partly in the hope that I could eventually I'd see enough pieces of the organization that I could finally make sense of the whole.

The thing is, I don't think I'm alone in this approach to a new job and I wouldn't be surprised if this is the way many libraries approach serving their communities. One patron said we should offer ebooks, another patron said we should offer vinyl LPs. Should both of these patrons' requests be given the same weight? If the only method of long range planning we're doing is waiting for patrons to tell us what to do, then we'll only be serving the patrons who do the most talking. The vast majority of library patrons interact very little with the staff. When a person knows exactly what book they want from the library then they shouldn't have to interact with a library staff person (unless they want to, of course).

So how should we be doing our long range planning? According to Godin we need to be figuring out what we can be the best in the world at. We could be talking about libraries in general here, or we could be talking about what your local library could be doing to be the best ___________ in your community. The point is, thanks to the wonders of the information age, competition is up and so there's little point in doing something unless you can do it exceptionally (not just well). This is a simple, yet hard to implement concept, especially for public libraries which try to fill so many roles in their communities.

This is a hard role for me to grasp personally as well. I tend to grasp the idea of focusing on your strengths organizationally, but as an employee I almost automatically try to do well at everything I attempt. I think it comes from always being a good student. I tried very hard to please all my teachers growing up (even the math teachers), because failing at anything would have just been too embarrassing. The thing is, in the professional world, it really makes sense to focus on what makes you uniquely qualified for a position, because there is always someone uniquely qualified to fill the roles that you aren't naturally good at.

As far as technology goes, I'm really good at explaining how things work to end users and being a liaison between the hardcore techies and the end users, but I know only the basics about programming languages, so put me in a role that requires me to be comfortable with tech and have conversations with others about it, but don't hire me to do some hardcore programming because you won't be impressed with the results.

At the organizational level  we should be thinking about what roles we are uniquely positioned to fill, not just roles that we can be good at. Should we become the career resource in the community or is there another organization that already does a better job at filling that role than we ever could (most organizations focused solely on this role have the potential to)? What about as a community resource to explore new and emerging technologies (or do you have an Apple store in town?)? The best book lender in town? The best place for quality children's programming? The best place to find answers to your questions when Google isn't enough? The best place to learn about community resources and events?

I don't have a definitive answer. I think every library has to answer that question for themselves, but I do think that this is a question we don't ask often enough. Too many times we try to serve several roles at once, getting in our own way of being best at anything.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2017 Reading Resolutions

Last year, I just barely squeaked out my 100 books, so I'm going to do attempt doing the same this year.

Total Books: 90 of 100

As in previous years, I'd also like to focus on reading books I own that have been languishing on my shelves. I'll be a little more realistic in my goal, though, and try to make this year the first I actually reach this particular milestone.

Books I Own: 15 of 25
The Elephants in My Backyard: A Memoir by Rajiv SurendraNever Broken: Songs Are Only Half the Story by JewelSuddenly One Summer by Julie JamesOn the Construction Site by Carron BrownOn the Space Station by Carron BrownSecrets of the Seashore by Carron BrownScarlett Epstein Hates it Here by Anna BreslawBreaking Character by Cameron GreyFinanicial Peace Junior: Teaching Kids How to Win With Money by Dave RamseyThe Wedding Trap by Adrienne BellThe 500 Hats of Bartholomew Cubbins by Dr. SeussMother Bruce by Ryan T. HigginsHotel Bruce by Ryan T. HigginsBruce's Big Move by Ryan T. HigginsMy Li…

NASIG 2015 - Day 3

The conference overload was starting to happen on Friday, but I soldiered on. At breakfast I talked to someone from a regional library council. Her background is in special libraries, but in her current position she works with a ton of teeny tiny public libraries, so I was excited to find someone with some common ground.As for the opening speaker, I was pleasantly surprised. The head honcho at Alexander Street Press talked about the future of open access publishing and the reception was mixed. First, he was surprised that librarians didn't think all scholarly publishing was going to be open access in the next decade. Then when he described how publishers were going to stay in business, basically by providing services that either make it easier for researchers to publish or to find what they're looking for in bare bones open access text, the crowd seemed ready to revolt and scream that that wasn't really open access. Maybe because I'm not in academia I'm not so up i…

2016 Reading in Review

I just barely got through my 100 book goal this year (and I'll admit, there were a lot of children's books padding that total), but I have to say I really enjoyed what I read. So now, without further ado, my favorites from what I read this year:


The Holy Bible - This was, without a doubt, my biggest reading accomplishment of the year. A feat I've attempted several times, but 2016 was the year I was successful. Reading this epic work as a whole helped me make sense of the less exciting parts and get a much better big picture view of the work as whole.Hamilton: The Revolution by Lin-Manuel Miranda & Jeremy McCarter - Was there anything I was more obsessed with this year than Hamilton? That's why this annotated script interspersed with short pieces about the show that's revolutionized Broadway has to be on this list. In 2017, I have tickets to finally see the production in Chicago.White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America by Nancy Isenberg - This…