Skip to main content

My Least Favorite Interview Question

I've alluded to the fact that I've been interviewing for librarian positions near my new home and someday when I'm not feeling so discouraged maybe I'll write more about the challenges of searching for a job in my particular area in this economy, etc., but for now I have to tell you all about my least favorite interview question.


I realize that I'm probably being a little oversensitive here and I fully admit that this is my particular pet peeve and probably not shared by the general population. Still, I just have to get it off my chest.


What makes you the best candidate for this position?


I know this is a pretty standard question and as easy to prepare for as "What's your biggest weakness?", so I always have a prepared answer for it, but I wouldn't be surprised if I often bomb it because it's so hard to keep my hatred of this question under wraps.

My hatred of this question is very specific to librarianship. I got into this field in part because it so cooperative and not cutthroat. I love how much help I've received from other librarians throughout my career because I'm the kind of person who is just as likely to give such help when asked. And frankly, the heart of what we do is helping other people. I don't care how much you love books, if you don't like helping people, you won't last long in this profession.

In a cooperative environment you get really good at figuring out your coworkers' strengths because you routinely seek them out to add their strengths to what you're doing and they similarly do the same thing with you. I'm used to figuring out what makes my colleagues special, so asking me why I'm more special than the other people being considered for this job feels so against the cooperative teamwork ethic that permeates this field.

I'm perfectly fine telling you why I'm a good, great, excellent, or even perfect fit for this job, but when you phrase it in a way that compares me to the other candidates for the position I can't stand it, because it's inherently unfair. I have no idea who else is up for the job, so I don't know what talents they have in comparison to mine. Besides, even if I did, I don't like picking people apart to make them look small so that I can look big. I should be able to stand on my own as an excellent candidate and I will tell you how awesome I am and where my biggest strengths lie, especially in relationship to the duties of the position you're considering me for. So what's the point of bringing the other people in the job search into it.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2017 Reading Resolutions

Last year, I just barely squeaked out my 100 books, so I'm going to do attempt doing the same this year.

Total Books:
Progress: 63 of 100

As in previous years, I'd also like to focus on reading books I own that have been languishing on my shelves. I'll be a little more realistic in my goal, though, and try to make this year the first I actually reach this particular milestone.

Books I Own
Progress: 11 of 25
The Elephants in My Backyard: A Memoir by Rajiv SurendraNever Broken: Songs Are Only Half the Story by JewelSuddenly One Summer by Julie JamesOn the Construction Site by Carron BrownOn the Space Station by Carron BrownSecrets of the Seashore by Carron BrownScarlett Epstein Hates it Here by Anna BreslawBreaking Character by Cameron GreyFinanicial Peace Junior: Teaching Kids How to Win With Money by Dave RamseyThe Wedding Trap by Adrienne BellThe 500 Hats of Bartholomew Cubbins by Dr. Seuss I still want to focus on finishing series (or dropping them as soon as I lose interes…

NASIG 2015 - Day 3

The conference overload was starting to happen on Friday, but I soldiered on. At breakfast I talked to someone from a regional library council. Her background is in special libraries, but in her current position she works with a ton of teeny tiny public libraries, so I was excited to find someone with some common ground.As for the opening speaker, I was pleasantly surprised. The head honcho at Alexander Street Press talked about the future of open access publishing and the reception was mixed. First, he was surprised that librarians didn't think all scholarly publishing was going to be open access in the next decade. Then when he described how publishers were going to stay in business, basically by providing services that either make it easier for researchers to publish or to find what they're looking for in bare bones open access text, the crowd seemed ready to revolt and scream that that wasn't really open access. Maybe because I'm not in academia I'm not so up i…

2016 Reading in Review

I just barely got through my 100 book goal this year (and I'll admit, there were a lot of children's books padding that total), but I have to say I really enjoyed what I read. So now, without further ado, my favorites from what I read this year:


The Holy Bible - This was, without a doubt, my biggest reading accomplishment of the year. A feat I've attempted several times, but 2016 was the year I was successful. Reading this epic work as a whole helped me make sense of the less exciting parts and get a much better big picture view of the work as whole.Hamilton: The Revolution by Lin-Manuel Miranda & Jeremy McCarter - Was there anything I was more obsessed with this year than Hamilton? That's why this annotated script interspersed with short pieces about the show that's revolutionized Broadway has to be on this list. In 2017, I have tickets to finally see the production in Chicago.White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America by Nancy Isenberg - This…