Skip to main content


While initially it was hard for me this week to transition from the class's first theme of "Dystopia/Utopia" to the second of "Being Human", now I have so many thoughts on the topic, I don't know where to start.

I find the movie Wall-E coming to mind again, maybe because I haven't read Brave New World, which has been talked about a lot. I guess Wall-E is my example of a world where technology has taken over subtly, lulling us into complacency by giving us everything we could ever want - except for the things that arguably make us human.

Sometimes this is the way I feel about TV, especially Netflix. In theory this sounds like a great service. You can stream TV shows and movies you're interested in whenever you feel like it, so the convenience aspect is wonderful. But somehow it all gets flipped on it's head, and instead it becomes so important to not only watch what I want, but the idea of a queue makes watching feel like another thing to add to my to-do list and I start looking for every possible opportunity to watch something, and I start to feel guilty when I don't keep up with what my friends are watching. But is sitting in front of a screen watching fictional people live out their lives really living? There are other forms of entertainment enhanced by technology in this way so that they become so easy, effortless, and rewarding that they take the place of other less technological but probably more "human" and more important things that I worry we're missing out on.

It's strange because the issues brought up in this course are making me sound like much more of a luddite than I thought I was. On the job I've generally been closer to the leading edge on new technology. At one workplace, I basically shared responsibility with another staff member for keeping our department up to date on new technology.

The more I read/watch from this week's class resources, the more I wonder if the distinction isn't between human and not human, but reality and not reality. The film "World Builder" was a great example of that. I don't think we could argue that the people in it are not humans acting in very human ways, but the world they are experiencing clearly is not real. I think that's what gets people nervous about technology. If our lives are lived on screens rather than in face to face interactions, is that really living?

I guess a lot of my concerns come out of becoming a parent. Above I have my son in a picture my husband posed to annoy me. I really wonder what his generation's relationship to technology is going to be. Obviously it will be much different than mine, and even more different than his grandparents'. And while generally I am grateful for all the wonderful things technology allows us to do faster and more easily, I also see how it makes things that aren't essential to our existence faster and easier, to the point that we can lose focus on the things that are really important. Is his generation on the path to mobile laz-e-boys with ever-present slushies to keep them hydrated and viewing screens to keep them entertained? Or will they harness new technologies to tackle the world's problems that have, up to this point, remained mysteries?

As I think about the discussions in this class about how online learning and MOOCs in particular, I realize that there's a lot left to be figured out yet. This was the first week where we had something resembling a traditional lecture as part of our class materials. Generally we've had a series of short films tackling the issue of the week and then a few articles addressing different aspects of that issue as well. We've had to two G+ hangouts as a class, but those are definitely not lectures, really more of an opportunity for the faculty involved in the course to discuss key issues in a conversational manner and answer common questions from the thousands of students enrolled. I think it is quite likely that online education will grow away from the model of traditional face-to-face education. While it's taken a little getting used to, I've still managed to take a lot away from this class, and I think the format has helped me to uncover different things than I would have if I were taking it in person.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2017 Reading Resolutions

Last year, I just barely squeaked out my 100 books, so I'm going to do attempt doing the same this year.

Total Books: 90 of 100

As in previous years, I'd also like to focus on reading books I own that have been languishing on my shelves. I'll be a little more realistic in my goal, though, and try to make this year the first I actually reach this particular milestone.

Books I Own: 15 of 25
The Elephants in My Backyard: A Memoir by Rajiv SurendraNever Broken: Songs Are Only Half the Story by JewelSuddenly One Summer by Julie JamesOn the Construction Site by Carron BrownOn the Space Station by Carron BrownSecrets of the Seashore by Carron BrownScarlett Epstein Hates it Here by Anna BreslawBreaking Character by Cameron GreyFinanicial Peace Junior: Teaching Kids How to Win With Money by Dave RamseyThe Wedding Trap by Adrienne BellThe 500 Hats of Bartholomew Cubbins by Dr. SeussMother Bruce by Ryan T. HigginsHotel Bruce by Ryan T. HigginsBruce's Big Move by Ryan T. HigginsMy Li…

NASIG 2015 - Day 3

The conference overload was starting to happen on Friday, but I soldiered on. At breakfast I talked to someone from a regional library council. Her background is in special libraries, but in her current position she works with a ton of teeny tiny public libraries, so I was excited to find someone with some common ground.As for the opening speaker, I was pleasantly surprised. The head honcho at Alexander Street Press talked about the future of open access publishing and the reception was mixed. First, he was surprised that librarians didn't think all scholarly publishing was going to be open access in the next decade. Then when he described how publishers were going to stay in business, basically by providing services that either make it easier for researchers to publish or to find what they're looking for in bare bones open access text, the crowd seemed ready to revolt and scream that that wasn't really open access. Maybe because I'm not in academia I'm not so up i…

2016 Reading in Review

I just barely got through my 100 book goal this year (and I'll admit, there were a lot of children's books padding that total), but I have to say I really enjoyed what I read. So now, without further ado, my favorites from what I read this year:

The Holy Bible - This was, without a doubt, my biggest reading accomplishment of the year. A feat I've attempted several times, but 2016 was the year I was successful. Reading this epic work as a whole helped me make sense of the less exciting parts and get a much better big picture view of the work as whole.Hamilton: The Revolution by Lin-Manuel Miranda & Jeremy McCarter - Was there anything I was more obsessed with this year than Hamilton? That's why this annotated script interspersed with short pieces about the show that's revolutionized Broadway has to be on this list. In 2017, I have tickets to finally see the production in Chicago.White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America by Nancy Isenberg - This…